With the BOM forecast hovering at 39 currently.. wonder how many sides remembered about the reserve day Sunday, and more importantly wonder how many will be affected if they have to play Sunday..
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Zartan wrote:With the BOM forecast hovering at 39 currently.. wonder how many sides remembered about the reserve day Sunday, and more importantly wonder how many will be affected if they have to play Sunday..
Can affect umpire availability too which could cause some controversy....
Zartan wrote:With the BOM forecast hovering at 39 currently.. wonder how many sides remembered about the reserve day Sunday, and more importantly wonder how many will be affected if they have to play Sunday..
Can affect umpire availability too which could cause some controversy....
I wonder what the decision would be if an umpire was unavailable for the reserve day? Would they find someone else, would teams umpire themselves?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Zartan wrote:With the BOM forecast hovering at 39 currently.. wonder how many sides remembered about the reserve day Sunday, and more importantly wonder how many will be affected if they have to play Sunday..
Rose Park would have to forfeit as we go to the 1pm Church session on a Sunday
Zartan wrote:With the BOM forecast hovering at 39 currently.. wonder how many sides remembered about the reserve day Sunday, and more importantly wonder how many will be affected if they have to play Sunday..
Rose Park would have to forfeit as we go to the 1pm Church session on a Sunday
Name of a new pub with a Sunday Sesh in the beer garden?
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Zartan wrote:With the BOM forecast hovering at 39 currently.. wonder how many sides remembered about the reserve day Sunday, and more importantly wonder how many will be affected if they have to play Sunday..
Rose Park would have to forfeit as we go to the 1pm Church session on a Sunday
Name of a new pub with a Sunday Sesh in the beer garden?
Zartan wrote:Finals time - Rose Park would have to be the shortest odds in history to win both A & B grade flags.. Had Enfield beat them on Saturday they would've missed out, but too much depth in their B Grade, and hard to see anyone actually coming close - especially if Bills fires.
The A grade get the week off this week, playing Enfield who continue to find ways to make batting look hard - bowled out for 94 against NEK.. 64 to Hancock and 8x sundries.. 22 runs amongst the other 10 batsmen
Last 3x games for Enfield batting has produced totals of 83, 83 and 94
Looking at 94 this week then?
Weren't far off being right again LM. 93 I think it was.
Certainly made us work for the win. Particularly with Keylock missing and Hancock out early. We were all Medium to well done by the time we finished.
I thought we paced our chase reasonably well for most of the day - we just failed to find that next gear after the tea break.
Also think, looking back perhaps we weren't so good in our chase - we played looked to see off Clarke and Uern, but unfortunately they bowled almost exclusively all day (26 overs each), and we didn't get that opportunity to face the change bowlers and attack them. Credit to Rose Park, they didn't give our batsmen many loose ones all day, and the ones we did get we couldn't put away or got us out (think two wickets to attempted pull shots).
Losing me at the start of the day and Hancock cheaply hurt as well, lost two players capable of keeping the score ticking over, and even more with Hancock because when we did need to start lifting he was already in the sheds.
Think we also shot ourselves in the foot by batting Brasser and Mansueto together - especially after Mead batting so long - we should've sent Feltus in earlier to give him more time and opportunity to get into his innings, and reserved Mansueto to replace Brasser when he got out. As a result, the Brasser/Mansueto partnership saw the run rate creep up to 6 rpo.. poor kid works hard but it's either a boundary or nothing - not many singles on offer.
Well done to Rose Park, better side overall, and will be hard to beat in the GF.. we probably did well to only be chasing 150 and not 250-300 week one.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
Talking to George Saturday, and he had an interesting thought.. What's peoples thoughts with Grand Finals being played at a neutral venue outlined at the beginning of the year, dependant on quality of ground and facility? Using the grounds that have club rooms/change rooms etc. For instance this weeks Div 1 GF being played at Terama instead of St Pauls.
Personally I reckon you finish high enough to earn that little incentive of playing home, you deserve to play where you like.
Dolphin Treasure wrote:Your an attention seeking embarsement..
