SA Footy

very rare around here

dedja wrote:

mal wrote:

dedja wrote:

another grub wrote:Couple of dog acts in the game

Go on …

Heres one ?
Jacob KENNErLy

Who did he hit?

KENNEL ...dog act !!!!! dogs live in kennels!!!

Great game. And a fair result as Glenelg along with Sturt are this years best teams.

Side issue.... as good as Callow is, his goal kicking is at "Butcher" level.

Kennerly wasnt the only one.....Couple of other LOW acts too. Anything ring a BELL ?

Jim05 wrote:

dedja wrote:Toss of a coin, well played to both teams.

Pity the winner is going to be smashed next week.

Yeh, we beat each other up physically and Sturt would be having a good old chuckle. Unless there is bad weather they’ll win by 70

The BOM forecast this evening:

Sunday 21 September

Summary
Min 10
Max 17
Shower or two.
Possible rainfall: 0 to 3 mm
Chance of any rain: 60%

Adelaide area

Cloudy. Medium chance of showers, most likely during the morning. Winds southwesterly 20 to 30 km/h.

69 points it is then.

another grub wrote:Kennerly wasnt the only one.....Couple of other LOW acts too. Anything ring a BELL ?

Looks like you’re the only one sniping … everyone else is only posting how good the contest was.

Ding-a-ling

5 GF’s in 7 years, no one gives us a chance.
We’ve got more chance than 8 other clubs.
See you next Sunday…

Spargo wrote:5 GF’s in 7 years, no one gives us a chance.
We’ve got more chance than 8 other clubs.
See you next Sunday…

Pseudo might argue 6 though …

dedja wrote:

nwdfanparade wrote:In 1960 Norwood beat Port Adelaide in the preliminary final to deny Port's 7th Premiership in a row. Will History repeat itself on Sunday by Norwood denying Glenelg a third premiership in a row?

Point of order, the 2 events need to be the same to be a repeat, so the answer is no

History did repeat itself. Another game lost due to goal inaccuracy.

Kudos to the class of JK and other Norwood fans on here. Quality outfit at the Parade and demonstrated by their on-field officials who are rippers.

Proud of my footy club for getting the job done again. Our history is littered with lost opportunities and missed chances but this current playing group just keeps on producing the results when it matters.

Not sure if we can do it again as Sturt have been far and away the best team all year and have been driven in correcting the last two years.

Our chances are less than two fifths of phark all but then again nothing would surprise me with this group.

Spargo wrote:5 GF’s in 7 years, no one gives us a chance.
We’ve got more chance than 8 other clubs.
See you next Sunday…

And going for 3 flags in a row … odds are apparently 1000000/1

Spargo wrote:5 GF’s in 7 years, no one gives us a chance.
We’ve got more chance than 8 other clubs.
See you next Sunday…

Who are the no ones who give you no chance?!

Going for 3 in a row, the underdog tag routine is getting dull!

Best 2 teams all year in the GF…. Good result fir the league, will be a great game

northerner wrote:Great game. And a fair result as Glenelg along with Sturt are this years best teams.

Side issue.... as good as Callow is, his goal kicking is at "Butcher" level.

Was gripping viewing but hardly a great game. They'd need to sharpen up to beat Sturt.

Apologies, will try to up the quality next week but can’t guarantee it will be up to your standard.

mots02 wrote:

Spargo wrote:5 GF’s in 7 years, no one gives us a chance.
We’ve got more chance than 8 other clubs.
See you next Sunday…

Who are the no ones who give you no chance?!

Going for 3 in a row, the underdog tag routine is getting dull!

Best 2 teams all year in the GF…. Good result fir the league, will be a great game

Give it a break … start the printers!

going to be a long week

Played 23 won 17, lost 6….

am Bays wrote:Played 23 won 17, lost 6….

I’m not playing your silly game next week.

Was a bloody well umpired game

Scott, Hughes and Williams did a good job. They let the game go

am Bays wrote:Was a bloody well umpired game

Scott, Hughes and Williams did a good job. They let the game go

This is usually when I take the umpire piss, but … might have to agree with you. Tended to let it go rather that pay an easy one, and there will always be the odd decision, but they generally made less mistakes than the players did.