Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood
dedja wrote:am Bays wrote:Played 23 won 17, lost 6….
I’m not playing your silly game next week.
Neither am I
dedja wrote:am Bays wrote:Played 23 won 17, lost 6….
I’m not playing your silly game next week.
am Bays wrote:dedja wrote:am Bays wrote:Played 23 won 17, lost 6….![]()
I’m not playing your silly game next week.
Neither am I
Brodlach wrote:As a neutral, excellent game to watch
jackpot jim wrote:Brodlach wrote:As a neutral, excellent game to watch
As a neutral i left at half time as the game was terrible.with only the closeness of the scores making it interesting
Genuine football collision IMO.The Hound wrote:Was Callow going for the ball in the Proud incident or just wanting to hurt someone because he hardly touched the footy, genuine question.
Young lad in the Ammos recently got 4 games for using the knee in a ruck contest, which broke the ribs of the opposition ruckman
Jim05 wrote:Genuine football collision IMO.The Hound wrote:Was Callow going for the ball in the Proud incident or just wanting to hurt someone because he hardly touched the footy, genuine question.
Young lad in the Ammos recently got 4 games for using the knee in a ruck contest, which broke the ribs of the opposition ruckman
Jim05 wrote:Genuine football collision IMO.The Hound wrote:Was Callow going for the ball in the Proud incident or just wanting to hurt someone because he hardly touched the footy, genuine question.
Young lad in the Ammos recently got 4 games for using the knee in a ruck contest, which broke the ribs of the opposition ruckman
Spargo wrote:5 GF’s in 7 years, no one gives us a chance.
We’ve got more chance than 8 other clubs.
See you next Sunday…
The Hound wrote:Was Callow going for the ball in the Proud incident or just wanting to hurt someone because he hardly touched the footy, genuine question.
Young lad in the Ammos recently got 4 games for using the knee in a ruck contest, which broke the ribs of the opposition ruckman