Page 6 of 6

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2025 11:26 pm
by am Bays
dedja wrote:
am Bays wrote:Played 23 won 17, lost 6….


I’m not playing your silly game next week. :oops:


Neither am I :oops:

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2025 11:29 pm
by dedja
am Bays wrote:
dedja wrote:
am Bays wrote:Played 23 won 17, lost 6….
:D

I’m not playing your silly game next week. :oops:


Neither am I :oops:


Although 8 from 22 sounds better than 4 from 17

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 12:31 am
by jackpot jim
Brodlach wrote:As a neutral, excellent game to watch


As a neutral i left at half time as the game was terrible.with only the closeness of the scores making it interesting

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Mon Sep 15, 2025 1:16 am
by dedja
jackpot jim wrote:
Brodlach wrote:As a neutral, excellent game to watch


As a neutral i left at half time as the game was terrible.with only the closeness of the scores making it interesting


Ask for a refund :D

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 10:27 am
by The Hound
Was Callow going for the ball in the Proud incident or just wanting to hurt someone because he hardly touched the footy, genuine question.
Young lad in the Ammos recently got 4 games for using the knee in a ruck contest, which broke the ribs of the opposition ruckman

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 10:48 am
by Jim05
The Hound wrote:Was Callow going for the ball in the Proud incident or just wanting to hurt someone because he hardly touched the footy, genuine question.
Young lad in the Ammos recently got 4 games for using the knee in a ruck contest, which broke the ribs of the opposition ruckman
Genuine football collision IMO.

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 11:10 am
by wenchbarwer
Jim05 wrote:
The Hound wrote:Was Callow going for the ball in the Proud incident or just wanting to hurt someone because he hardly touched the footy, genuine question.
Young lad in the Ammos recently got 4 games for using the knee in a ruck contest, which broke the ribs of the opposition ruckman
Genuine football collision IMO.


I tend to agree. The cheap shot in the ammos was that lad's second offence this year, seems to be a real slow learner...

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 11:12 am
by Pseudo
Jim05 wrote:
The Hound wrote:Was Callow going for the ball in the Proud incident or just wanting to hurt someone because he hardly touched the footy, genuine question.
Young lad in the Ammos recently got 4 games for using the knee in a ruck contest, which broke the ribs of the opposition ruckman
Genuine football collision IMO.

Yep, no malice.

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 2:14 pm
by norwood8
Spargo wrote:5 GF’s in 7 years, no one gives us a chance.
We’ve got more chance than 8 other clubs.
See you next Sunday…


Who gives you no chance??

Any side with McBean and Hosie should be challenging for the flag every year.

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 2:20 pm
by dedja
The Hound wrote:Was Callow going for the ball in the Proud incident or just wanting to hurt someone because he hardly touched the footy, genuine question.
Young lad in the Ammos recently got 4 games for using the knee in a ruck contest, which broke the ribs of the opposition ruckman


Callow act …

Nah, if Callow had a brain then you could make a very flimsy case that it was deliberate, but not here, just a clumsy attempt at the ball and unfortunately Max in the firing line.

Play on …

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 2:36 pm
by MannyK
Crowd 10,957 Largest Prelim Crowd since 2008

Well done.

Re: Preliminary Final Glenelg v Norwood

PostPosted: Tue Sep 16, 2025 3:08 pm
by The Hound
Imagine if the Crows where in the Prelim, with all their SANFL supporters that crowd number would have been more